← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3100/2007withdrawn

Dr. M.P. Khare v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

2015-02-05Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

c^ ^z

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

^ WRITPETITION (S) N0.

OF 2007 PETITIONER /Or. M. P. Khare, S/o Late ^ J. P. Khare, aged 57 years, Occupation-Service, posted As District Immunization Officer (substantively holding Post of Child Specialist) & Officiating as District Health Officer, Office of the Chief, Medical & Health Officer, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) .....••-^^'

>•*'' .••^\'"'

-.'•*'

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Health & Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) / Director l-1ealth Services Chhattisgarh, Directorate Of Health Services, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS ^,/?, ^ ^y v / •(.- ^^^o'

^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTK3N OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS.DIRECTIONORDIRECTIONS.

ORDER

OR ORDERS.

^ 7i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR D.8.:

HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY, J.

WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3100 of2007 PETITLONER Dr. M.P. Khare

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh and Another RESPQNDENTS (WRIT PETITIQ aiNt)ERiARTICLE 226 OR THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Appearance:

~ ^ M;r Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioner. . :;,,%Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy.Advocate General forthe State.^ , ,.

ORDER

(5th6fFebruary,2015) PER NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CJ.

1.

Learned Counsel-Toi- the Parties are agreed that the Petitioner has superannuated during theipenciencyot^he writ petition. 2.

In view of the subsequent development the larger question of law with regard to the validity of the Chhattisgarh Public Health and Family Welfare (Gazetted) Service Recruitmenf Rules, in Column-3, Serial No.3, ScheduIe-IV ofthe same has become academic.

3.

The writ petition is disposed as infructuous leaving open the question with regard to the validity of the Rules for examination in another appropriate case.

4.

The petition is disposed as infructuous.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Anu Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice