Rajeshwar Lal Dewangan And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 6005 of 2010

1. Rajeshwar Lal Dewangan, son of Shri Tejau Raj Dewangan, aged about 38 years, resident of Near S.E.C.L. Gate, Appollo Hospital, Lingiyadhi, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Ram Dayal Patel, son of Shri Jagendra Singh Patel, aged about 34 years, resident of Village Karaa, Post Dari Ghat,. Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2. Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council through its Director, Paramedical Council, Raipur (CG)

3. Registrar, Chhattisgarh Sah Chikitshiya Parishad, Directorate of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel Premises, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

4. Course Director, Paramedical Ceretificate Course, Raipur (CG)

5. Secretary, Chhattisgarh Sah Chikitshiya Parishad, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

6. Acharya Institute of Medical Sciences, managed by the Public Health Sciences Reserach Eduational Organisation, through its President, Akbar Khan Ki Chaal, Mission Hospital Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Amrito Das, Advocate For Res.No.1 and 7 :

Mr.Aditya Sharma, P.L.

For Res.No.2 to 5 :

Mr.Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For Res.No.6 :

Mr.Harsh Wardhan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 10/05/2017 1.

The petitioners application for registration of Paramedical Practitioners has been rejected by order dated 24.11.2015 (copy of order dated 24.11.215 has been attached in WP (C) No.2655 of 2011). 2.

Order dated 24.11.2015 itself indicates that such an order is appealable under Section 43 of the Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council Act, 2001 before the Appellate Authority.

3.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be allowed to prefer an appeal before the Appellate Authority.

4.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

5.

The petitioners are permitted to do so. If the petitioners prefer an appeal within 30 days from today before the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority would do well and decide the appeal of the petitioners within a further period of two months from the date of filing of the appeal on behalf of the petitioners.

6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed off. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-