Vritpal Sindhu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 412 of 2018 Vritpal Sindhu S/o Late Shri Choudhary Mittersen , Aged About 52 Years R/o Garud Nagar Gevra Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Mantralaya Naya Raipur Post Officer And Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Board Of Revenue Through The Chairman Board Of Revenue Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, Through The Regional Officer, Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Additional Collector, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

7. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Katghora District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

8. Additional Tahsildar, Dipka, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

9. Santosh Agarawal, Senior Manager, Chhattisgarh Coal And Power Limited Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. B. D. Guru, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. Advocate General.

For Respondent No. 5 :

Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 9 :

Mr. Abhuday Singh, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board 16/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that against the order dated 25.09.2012, revision preferred by respondent No. 9 before respondent No. 2 under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 is pending consideration since 12.10.2012 in which the petitioner is a party and the interim order is operating against him since then but the Board of Revenue has not taken any final decision till date. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the records with utmost circumspection.

3.

Considering the fact that the matter is pending consideration since 12.10.2012 before the respondent No. 2 - Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, the said authority is directed to conclude the revisional proceedings in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka