Laxmi Prasad Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 96 of 2019 • Laxmi Prasad Kashyap S/o Ram Lakhan Kashyap Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Superintendent Of Police Janjgir District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
4. Collector Janjgir District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
5. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
6. Tahsildar Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
7. Station House Officer Police Station Birra, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
8. Jagdish Banjare R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
9. Prahlad Banjare R/o Village Birra Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 10.Mahendra Pal Banjare R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
11. Heera Lal Baghel R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 12.Ramlal Baghel R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 13.Chand Ram Banjare R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 14.Pyarelal R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 15.Jagat Ram R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 16.Mani Ram R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa,
Chhattisgarh 17.Shivlal R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 18.Heera Ram Banjare R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 19.Dev Prasad Bhardwaj R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 20.Rohit Bhardwaj R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 21.Dinesh Banjare R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri CJK Rao, Advocate For Respondent/State :
Ms. Shivali Dubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 19/02/2019
1. Heard.
2. The present petition is for non-registration of the FIR against respondents No.8 to 21.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents No.8 to 21 forcefully entered into the shop of the petitioner and demolished it and despite the report made no FIR is lodged. He referred to Annexure P-2, P-3 & P-4 and submits that the police was bound to register the FIR and investigate the matter.
4. Perused the documents. The following relief has been prayed for by the petitioner :-
"10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ (S), order (S), direction (S) by directing the respondent authorities, particularly Station House Officer, Birra (Respondenet No. 7) to register the F.I.R. against the offenders (as mentioned in the complaint, Annexure P-2 & P3), as per Section 154 of Cr. P.C. and the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Others, in the interest of justice.
10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the matter. as an alternative relief, the petitioner pray that, the matter may kindly be referred to an independent investigation agency for investigating the entire matter.
10.3 Any other relief (s) in form of order or orders and/or direction (s) as your lordships may deem fit and proper."
5. Considering the allegations made in Annexure P-2, P-3 & P-4, wherein named FIR has been made, therefore, in view of the law laid down in the matter of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others {(2014) 2 SCC 1} the concerned police shall lodge the FIR and carry out the investigation as prima facie cognizable offence has been reported, therefore, the concerned police authority is directed to register the FIR taking into the nature of the complaint and investigate the same. It is further made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
6. With such observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu