Prem Singh Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 98 of 2018 • Prem Singh Sahu S/o S/o Late Thanwar Sahu, Aged About 63 Years R/o Azad Chowk, Jaigiri, Bmy, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Labour Secretary And Labour Commissioner, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. President, State Industrial Court Of Chhattisgarh At Raipur, Mahanadi Khand, Near D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Pragatisheel Cement Shramik Sangh, Labour Camp, Jamul, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. General Manager (Now Vice President), The Associated Cement Companies Limited, Registered Under Indian Companies Act With The Registrar Of Companies, Bombay, Registered Office At Cement House 121, Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai-20 Carrying On Manufacture Of Cement In The Name Of Jamul Cement Works At Jamul, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh Through Its Vice President I.M. Sharma., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :

Shri Puneet Ruparel, Advocate For State :

Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan , Chief Justice 19.02.2018 1) We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant/Writ Petitioner. We have also heard the learned Government Advocate.

wa 98 of 2018 2) Whatever be the contentions of the appellant in this appeal, the fact of the matter remains that the impugned order, on its face, was issued by the learned Single Judge on the premise of a request on behalf of the Writ Petitioner that the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the verdict in the case Ghanaram Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others (WPS-6107 of 2017). That being so, judicial comity and propriety do not persuade us to entertain this Writ Appeal. We cannot but therefore, close this Writ Appeal without prejudice to the right, if any, of the Writ Petitioner/appellant to pursue any remedy before the learned Single Judge, by way of review or otherwise.

3) Subject to what is aforesaid, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Chief Justice Judge padma