Taman Lal Verma And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4896 of 2010
1. Taman Lal Verma, aged about 28 years, S/o Gaya Ram Verma, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi Verg-2, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Nagar Panchayat, Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.)
2. Pradeep Gupta, aged about 21 years, S/o Shri Suresh Gupta, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi Verg-2, Govt. Girls Primary School, Dhamdha
3. Ku. Savitri Verma, aged 23 years, Daughter of Nirbhaya Lal Verma, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi, Govt. Primary School, Dhamdha
4. Smt. Gayatri Agrawal, aged 28 years, W/o Shri Prakash Agrawal, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi, Boys Higher Secondary School, Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.)
5. Ku. Chitra Rekha Thakur, aged 21 years, D/o Ramhu Ram Thakur, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi Verg-3, Govt Girls Middle School, Dhamdha
6. Devnath Dhidhi, aged 21 years, S/o Shri Sukhdeo Dhidhi, Ex Shiksha Karmi, Govt. Girls Middle School, Dhamdha
7. Trayambak Sahu, aged 24 years, S/o Sunder Lal Sahu, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi, Govt. Primary School, Tamerpara, Dhamdha
8. Smt. Sabnam Parvin, aged 24 years, W/o Shafik Mohammed Qureshi, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi, Govt. Pry. School, Tamerpara, Dhamdha
9. Mahendra Kumar Jangade, aged 21 years, S/o Krishna Lal, Ex-Samvida Shiksha Karmi, Govt. Middle School, T'para, Dhamdha ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Nagariya Prashashan and Vikash Vibhag Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Secretary, Gramin and Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
3. The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
4. Director, Nagariya Prashashan and Vikash Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.)
5. Nagar Panchayat, Dhamdha, through the Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners Mr. V. K. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. R. K. Bhagat, Dy. GA For Respondent No.5 Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 14/06/2021 1.
Mr. V. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that by the efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.
The statement made by Mr. Sharma is placed on record.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala