High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/391/2018disposed off

Bali Ram Chaurasia v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.391 of 2018 Bali Ram Chaurasia S/o S/o Shri Chaitu Ram, Aged About 62 Years Head Master, Government Girls Middle School, Surangpani Block Pathalgaon District Jashpur, Civil And Revenue District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, School Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, Block - C, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Deputy Director, High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pandit Deendayal Nagar, Sector-4, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Shri Sahas Ram Aarya, S/o S/o Shri Injore Sai, Posted As Head Master, Government Boys Middle School, Surangpani, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/02/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a complaint made by the petitioner against the respondent No.7 is

pending consideration before respondent No.6 with regard to the forge caste certificate, against which this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously.

(2) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make application before respondent No.6 for urgent hearing of the said complaint. If such application is filed by the petitioner before respondent No.6, in that event respondent No.6 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously from the date of filing of such application.

(3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-