High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/458/2016withdrawn

Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited Arcil v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-07-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 458 of 2016 • Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (Arcil) A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 And Registered As Securitisation Of Asset Reconstruction Company Pursuant To Section 3 Of The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Reconstruction Of Security Interest Act, 2002, Having Its Registered Office At The Ruby, 10th Floor, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar West, Mumbai400028 (In Capacity As The Trustee Of Arcil- S B P S- 001- X I V Trust, Through Its Authorized Signatory- Srinivasa Yekabote Son Of Shri Y. Ramachandra, Aged About 31 Years, Posted As Manager, Asset Reconstruction Company ( India) Limited ( Arcil) Address- The Ruby, 10th Floor, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar West, Mumbai - 400028 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Commercial And Trade Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Commercial Tax Officer, Raipur Circle- 9, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Additional Tahsildar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. M/s Saini Industries Limited, Registered Office At 80- A, Phase- Il, Siltara Industries Area, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Charanjeet Singh Saini Son Of Jagdish Singh Saini, R/o H I G- 10, Tatibandh, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

5. State Bank of India, A Corporation Under State Bank Of India Act, 1955, Having Its Central Office At State Bank Bhavan, Corporate Centre Madam Cama Road, Nairman Point, Mumbai- 400021 ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri D. Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri PK Bhaduri, GA for the State For Respondent No.5 :

Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/07/2016

1. Heard on I.A. No.2, which is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition.

2. On due consideration, the application (I.A. No.2) is allowed.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for in the application.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu