High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/265/2017disposed off

Tuman Singh Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 265 of 2017

1. Tuman Singh Sahu S/o Jalam Singh Sahu, Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Kurra, Post Office Bagaud, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

2. Narayan Das Manikpuri, S/o Harak Das Manikpuri, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Kanharpuri, Tahsil & Post Kurud, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)

3. Neelmani Sahu S/o Kishan Lal Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Puri, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. District Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Collector, Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

6. Block Education Officer, Kurud, Block Magarlod, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)

7. Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Deori, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

8. Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Bagdehi, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

9. Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Kathiya, Block Aarang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents Shri R.S.Baghel, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri D.R.Minj, Dy.G.A. for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/04/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks modification of the earlier order

passed on 02/03/2017 in WPS No.399/2017 on the submission that similar cases have already been disposed off by this Court and this fact was not reflected in the order.

Learned State counsel submits that this Court has not decided any issue. Whether or not, that is recorded in the order, it is always open for the petitioners to press their representation before the competent authority on the ground that similar cases have been decided by this Court.

This Court has already granted opportunity to the petitioners to prefer representation. The competent authority shall decide the matter in accordance with law. It would be open for the petitioners to press all their submissions which are open to them under the law.

With the said observation, MCC is disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti