Anjordas v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1088 of 2019 Anjordas S/o Charandas Mahilange Aged About 35 Years R/o Dodkibhata, Police Station Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri A.D. Kuldeep, Advocate For the State :

Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /02/2019

1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.237/2018 registered at Police Station Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 506, 323, 307 of IPC.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 07/08/2018 about 6 p.m. at village Dodkibhata, applicant caused injuries on the body of complainants Bhagbali and Jitendra Kumar by wooden club. He has also abused them. As per MLC of complainant Bhagbali swelling, bleeding in left eye abrasion on left hand were found. As per the MLC report of Jitendra Kumar pain and abrasion were found. As per the query report left zygomatic frontotemporal low fracture was found on head of complainant Bhagbali. As per the CT Scan intra cerebral hematoma was suggested regarding complainant Bhagbali.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the injuries caused by the applicant, looking to the seriousness of the alleged offence, looking to the impact of granting bail to the applicant on society, the present bail application is rejected.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde