Dr. Shailendra Kumar Pradhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 970 of 2019 Dr. Shailendra Kumar Pradhan S/o Late Shri Sakharam Pradhan, Aged About 61 Years, Working As Revenue Officer In Municipal Corporation, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. R/o Azad Nagar, Takhatpur, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Town Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Town Administration And Development Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
4. The General Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Second Floor, Chhattisgarh State Kaushal Vikas Pradhikaran Bhawan, Old Police Head Quarter Campus, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :
Shri Tarun Dansena, Advocate.
For State :
Shri Arvind Dubey, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14/02/2019
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for being transferred to either at his home town or nearby place considering the fact that only 8 months period is left for his retirement as the petitioner would
retire from service w.e.f. 30.09.2019. The petitioner, in this regard has already made representation to respondent no.2 and other authorities in the department which till date has not been considered.
2. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if respondent no.2 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the rules and policy governing the field. It is ordered accordingly. Let this exercise be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Khatai