← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2501/2017disposed off

Rakesh Roshan Kesharwani v. Idbi Bank Ltd.

2017-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2501 of 2017 Rakesh Roshan Kesharwani S/o Janak Lal Kesharwani, Aged About 34 Years Branch Head, I D B I Bank Ltd. Kanker, District Uttar Bastar ( Kanker ) Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. IDBI Bank Ltd. Through The Dy. General Manager, Zonal Office, I D B I House, Janpath Ground Floor, Unit- I X, Bhubaneshwar ( Orissa ).

2. The Dy. General Manager ( Regional Head ), I D B I Bank Ltd. Regional Office C. G. -1, Dev Tower, Near Holy Heart School, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. Ranjan Singh, Aged About 35 Years Branch Head, I D B I Bank Ltd. Jhumri Telaiya, District Koderma, Jharkhand. ..Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-Bank :

Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 10/07/2017 Heard.

1.

The petitioner by this petition has challenged the legality and validity of order dated 12.05.2017 by which the petitioner has been transferred from Kanker to Jamshedpur.

2.

The grounds raised by the petitioner do not relate to either jurisdictional infirmity or any personal malice of the authority exercising power of transfer. In the absence of such allegation or any patent illegality or arbitrariness, instead of keeping this matter pending, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to dispose off this petition, at this stage, with a direction to the respondents to consider petitioner's representation in accordance with their own policy.

3.

As there is a dispute whether the petitioner had actually submitted representation or not, without commenting upon the merits of the case, if the petitioner submits representation within a period of ten days from today, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Since there was an order that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, as an ad-interim measure, it would be appropriate to continue the same for a period of four weeks.

4.

The petition is disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha