← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/30/2013withdrawn

Dilip Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPPIL No. 30 of 2013 • Dilip Patel S/o Karshan Bhai Patel Aged About 59 Years R/o Plot No. 18, Patrakar Colony, Colony No. 2, Infront Of Indira Awas, Behind Sbi Colony, Fafadih, Ps Devendra Nagar, Raipur Civil And Rev. Distt. Raipur C.G. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Sanskritik Awam Dharmik Nyas Mahanadi Bhawan, Manatralaya, Raipur C.G. 2.

Secretary Urban Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

3.

Collector Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

4.

Superintendent Of Police Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G. 5.

Municipal Corporation Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

6.

Raipur Development Authority Through The Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G. 7.

Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raipur Dist Raiur, C.G. 8.

Station House Officer Police Station, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

9.

Jaggu Singh Thakur Councilor, Rani Laxmi Bai Ward No.23, Sector 4 Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

10.

President Indira Awas Nagar Vikas Awam Jan Kalyan Samiti, Infront Of Jain Kirana Sotre, Indra Awas, Rani Laxmi Bai Ward No. 23, Fafadih, Raipur, Dist Raipur, C.G.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate.

For State & its authorities :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Adv. General.

For respondent No.6 :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja Order on Board 31-08-2015 Per Pritinker Diwaker, J.

1.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the decision taken by the Committee on 30.07.2015, at this stage, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file duly constituted petition.

WP(PIL) 30 of 2013 2.

State counsel has no objection to the proposition as put-forth by the petitioner.

3.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (I.S. Uboweja) JUDGE JUDGE chandra