← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1762/2017dismissed

Shanichar Das v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1762 of 2017 Shanichar Das S/o Amaru Das, R/o Village- Chhirrapali, Tahsil- Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, (Land Acquisition Officer) Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar, Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Engineer, Irrigation Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Sanjay Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 30/06/2017 The present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the Collector, District Mahasamund to decide Annexure P-1 which is a representation for grant of compensation against the land which is alleged to have been acquired by the respondents way back in the year 1983-84. 2.

This Court finds it difficult to entertain the petition for the reason that the petition has not been supported with any document by which the petitioner has been able to establish the title over the alleged land for which compensation has been sought in respect of the alleged acquisition done by the respondents. Moreover, this Court is also not inclined to entertain the petition on the ground

of delay and latches for the reason that the acquisition had taken place in the year 1983-84 and the present writ petition was filed on 27th June, 2017 i.e. after about 34 years and no proper explanation has been given for the said delay.

3.

On the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, this Court is reluctant to entertain the petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in limine.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola