Ramu @ Sani Mandal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 1240 OF 2016 Ramu @ Sani Mandal S/o.-Pachu Mandal, aged about-22 years, Occupation-Servant, R/o-Uma Shanti Apartment, 6th Floor, Quarter No.606, Kanke Road, P.S.-Gonda, Civil and Revenue District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) ---Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through: S.H.O. of the P.S. Kotra road, DistrictRaigarh (CG) ---Non-applicant For Applicant :
Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate.
For-Non-applicant :
Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 14/03/2016 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.274/2015, registered at Police Station-Kotra Road, District-Raigarh (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 478, 471, 419 & 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 66 (D) of the IT Act.
2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant and co-accused impersonating themselves as Manager of the State Bank of India, Central Branch obtained ATM code of the complainant and made on-line shopping and thereby committed the offence. 3.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in
question. He would submit that the applicant is in jail since 8.10.2015, charge-sheet has already been filed and no further custodial interrogation is required. Therefore, he may be released on bail. 4.
On the other hand, learned State counsel would oppose the bail application.
5.
Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of the offence and the manner in which the applicant and co-accused obtained ATM code of the complainant and made on-line shopping, I do not find any ground for grant of regular bail to the applicant. Consequently, bail application is rejected.
6.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-