Arun Kumar Bharti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1111 of 2020 • Arun Kumar Bharti S/o Shri Bharat Ram Aged About 28 Years Working As Stenographer Grade-3 At Office Of Deputy Director Public Prosecution Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Atal Nagar, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Public Prosecution Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Deputy Director Public Prosecution Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State-Respondents :

Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 20.02.2020

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Grade-III on 15.10.2012 with a condition that first two years would be the probation period. It is stated that subsequently after completion of probation of 2 years though no complaint or enquiry has been made against the petitioner, the petitioner has not been regularized till date.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit despite the probation period has been completed, no orders have been passed for his regularization though by efflux of terms of the initial appointment, he is deemed to be regularized, however, the formal orders are yet to be

passed. He further submits under these circumstances, the petitioner has made a representation to the Director Prosecution which may be directed to be decided.

3. Considering the submission made, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation within a period of 3 weeks to the respondent No.2/ Director Prosecution, who in turn shall decide the same within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Jyoti