High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/984/2015withdrawn

Madan Gopal Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 984 of 2015 • Madan Gopal Shrivastava, aged about 60 years, S/o Shri Shiv Charan Shrivastava R/o House No. Q/23, Green Paradise, Vishal Nagar, Behind Hotel Chhattisgarh Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tourism New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh Tourism Board Through The General Manager, Chhattisgarh Tourism Board, Paryatan Bhawan, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Managing Director Chhattisgarh Paryatan Mandal Paryatan Bhawan, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Santosh Kumar Mishra Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Paryatan Mandal Paryatan Bhawan, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri JD Bajpai, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri PK Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents 2 & 3 : Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/08/2015

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would show to this Court a copy of the order dated 30.7.2015 passed by the Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Tourism under the approval from Principal Secretary of

the Department. Copy of the said order is retained and made part of record of the writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since in the abovesaid order the State Government has decided to release the petitioner's salary from the month of April, 2014 onwards till date, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move representation before the State Government. He would also seek liberty to move afresh before this Court in the event grievance is not redressed.

3. In view of the statement made, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberties aforesaid. It is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberties. In the event the representation is preferred, the State Government shall decide the same at the earliest preferably within a period of one month.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve