← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/494/2019disposed off

Shree Sai Jan Shikesha Kalyan Samiti v. Union Of India

2019-02-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 494 of 2019 • Shree Sai Jan Shikesha Kalyan Samiti C/o Bhau Singh Chouhan Gram Gutuku Village Takhatpur Bilaspur Through Its Secretary M.P. Sharma , S/o Late Shri B.D.Sharma, Aged About 71 Years R/o C/o Bhau Singh Chouhan, Gram Gutuku Village Takhatpur Bilaspur Chhattiisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through Its Under Secretary Ministry Of Woman And Child Development (Govt. Of India) Shastri Bhawan New Delhi 110001

2. Additional Director (Desk) Central Social Welfare Board Dr. Durgabai Deshmukh Samaj Kalyan Bhawan New Delhi 110603

3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Women And Child Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralalya New Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Social Welfare Board, Old Police Head Quarter Campus, near Rajbhawan G.E. Road Raipur Chhattigarh.492001

5. Secretary Chhattisgarh State Social Welfare Board, Old Police Head Quarter Campus, near Rajbhawan G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001

6. Additional Director, Women And Child Development Sanchalnalaya Blocke A, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Varunendra Mishra, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA For Respondents 1 & 2 Ms. Arpana Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

19/2/2019

1. Heard.

2. It appears, the petitioner was allowed some grant by the Central Social Welfare Board, out of which, part has been paid and the balance remains unpaid.

3. The petitioner has moved a representation for releasing the remaining amount, however, no decision has yet been taken on the representation.

4. Let the petitioner move a fresh representation before respondent No.2 for releasing of the remaining part of the grant within a period of 4 weeks from today. On such representation being preferred, respondent No.2 shall decide the representation objectively by a reasoned order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 10 weeks thereafter.

5. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna