Shatruhan Prasad Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No.611 of 2016 Shatruhan Prasad Dadsena, son of Shri B.L. Dadsena, aged about 55 years, posted as Head Master, Government Pre Middle School Dalpurva, District Kabirdham (CG).

---Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur.

2. District Education Officer, District Kabirdham (CG).

3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury & Pension, Raipur, District Raipur. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Santosh Bharat, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Mr. Om Prakash Sahu, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 29/02/2016 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not been granted two advance increments after completion of D.Ed. Examination on his own expenses, during service, and his case is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg & Another1.

2.

However, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that respondents authorities would examine the matter and take decision in this regard.

1 2006(II) MPJR-CG 96

3.

Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers representation highlighting his grievances within two weeks from today, the respondents authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law in light of decision rendered by this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and pass necessary orders within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation.

4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE L/-