← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1256/2019disposed off

Laxmi Prasad Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No.1256 of 2019 Laxmi Prasad Dubey S/o Late Ved Prasad Dubey Aged About 63 Years Retd. Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Baima Nagoi, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, R/o Village And Post Kathakoni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Baima Nagoi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioner :

Mr. K.S. Pawar, Advocate.

For State :

MrMr. P Acharya, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 22/02/2019 1.

The claim of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that the petitioner has not been paid the benefits of the 7th Pay Commission which the petitioner is otherwise entitled for. The petitioner is said to have retired from the post of lecturer with effect from 31.01.2016. 2.

According to the petitioner initially there was an order of recovery against the petitioner which this Court in WPS No. 3271 of 2017 decided on 18.05.2018 had allowed and the recovery orders were quashed.

3.

According to the petitioner since the recovery order has been quashed there is no further impediment on the part of respondents in

-2not releasing the benefits of the 7th Pay Commission to the petitioner.

4.

Given the said facts, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would serve if the Writ Petition itself is disposed off with a direction to the respondents No.2 and 3 to promptly scrutinize the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefits of the 7th Pay Commission at the earliest and finalize the same within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Unless he is otherwise not entitled for the same under the Rules.

5.

It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No. 2 & 3 so far as the order passed by this Court. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ayushi/Jyoti