High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1340/2021disposed off

Smt. Rishi Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1340 of 2021

1. Smt. Rishi Goswami W/o Rudra Giri Goswami Aged About 51 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) At Government Primary School, Silli, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Karuna Goswami W/o Ashwani Giri Goswami Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) At Government Primary School, Lagra, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Amit Buxy, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/03/2021

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999,28.04.2008,03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 10years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of

Chhattisgarh and Others (W.PS) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

3. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioners is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit