Narsingh Shori v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1044 of 2019

1. Narsingh Shori S/o Late Shri Thanwar Shori Aged About 44 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Shala Senturmeta, R/o Village Senturmeta Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Suduram Matlaam S/o Shri Ravnuram Matlaam Aged About 46 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Shala Chichgaon R/o Village Chichgaon Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

3. Balsaye Surffay S/o Late Shri Dhannuram Surffay Aged About 44 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Shala Baagjhar, R/o Village Baagjhar Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

4. Chainsingh Nareti S/o Shri Modhuram Nareti Aged About 43 Years Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Pathsala Pusagaon, R/o Village Pusagaon Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

5. Pardeshi Ram Mandavi S/o Shri Sagnuram Mandavi Aged About 46 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Shala Uparkaamta R/o Village Uparkaamta Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

6. Smt. Ramkumari Nagesh S/o Shri Hitendra Kumar Nagesh Aged About 44 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Prathmik Shala Badetevda R/o Village Badetevda Thana Aamabeda Tahsil Antagadh District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Panchayat, Gramin Vikas And Shram Vibhag, Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Antagadh District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

4. District Education Officer Kanker District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. R.K. Patel, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

-218/02/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved