Shailendra Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1218 of 2020
1. Shailendra Singh S/o Shri Dewraj Singh Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted at Govt. Primary School Podikhurd, Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
2. Rohani Sandilya W/o Bhagwat Prasad Sandilya Aged About 43 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) and Posted At Govt. Primary School Malda, Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
3. Pratap Singh S/o Dayal Singh Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) and Posted At Govt. Primary School Khandpadi, Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
4. Samarsay Soy S/o Kawal Soy Aged About 50 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted at Govt. Primary School Jajagi, Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
5. Nitin Kumar Agrawal S/o Jugal Kishore Agrawal Aged About 35 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) and Posted At Govt. Primary School Podikhurd (Pasan), Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
6. Sunil Kumar Khairwar S/o Amrit Lal Khairwar Aged About 34 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Balak Ashram Merai, Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,
3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Korba, District Korba ., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
4. District Education Officer Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
6. Block Education Officer Block Podiuproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.--- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Pathak, Advocate For the State/Respondents : Mr. Kunal Das, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board
-02-2020
1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.
2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners..
3. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o