← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/507/2016dismissed

Ganeshnath Yogi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 507 of 2016 Ganeshnath Yogi S/o Amolnath, Aged About 42 Years Primary Member, Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Sonpurirani, Branch Birmona, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabeerdham (Chhattisgarh) R/o Birmona, Tahsil Kawardha, Distt. Kabeerdham, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Rajnandgaon, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

5. State Cooperative Election Commission, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Through Its Secretary, State Cooperative Election Commission, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (Chhattisgar ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate on advance copy.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 26/02/2016 Heard on admission.

1.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the voter list/ member list of various primary cooperative societies on the

ground that many of the cooperative societies, whose the Board of Director was also superseded, have been disqualified. 2.

Upon being enquired as to whether the petitioner has been disqualified either in personal capacity or in representative capacity, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as primary society of the petitioner is concerned, it is not disqualified. 3.

The petitioner society does not have locus to challenge disqualification of any other primary society. It is for the concerned society, if so advised, to challenge disqualification to be a voter in the election of Directors of the apex body. No relief can be granted at the instance of the petitioner.

4.

The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha