High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1600/2018dismissed

Mohar Sai Patel (M.P. Patel) v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1600 of 2018 Mohar Sai Patel (M.P. Patel) S/o Kripasindhu Patel, Aged About 58 Years, Presently Posted As Vice Principal (Lecturer Class) Eklabya Model Residential School, Chhote Mudpar, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Original Posted As Lecturer, At Govt. High School Telikot, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Tribal Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner, Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Welfare, Cum Secretary Of State Label C.G. Schedule Caste Welfare Residential And Ashram Educational Institution Committee, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Assistant Commissioner, Triable Welfare Department Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. The Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Chhattisgarh, Indravati, Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. The District Education, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

7. The Block Education Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Jeet Patel, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/02/18

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an application for revocation of suspension before the competent authority in accordance with law. 2.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka