High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/546/2016disposed off

Dr. S. C. Bharadwaj v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.546 of 2016

1. Dr. S.C. Bharadwaj, S/o late Shri D.L. Bharadwaj, aged about 64 years, retired Assistant Ayurvedic Medical Officer, R/o North Power House Road, Namnakala, Ambikapur, Post & Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja.

2. Dr. Vinod Khare, S/o late Shri Ramsey Khare, aged about 64 years, Retired Assistant Ayurvedic Medical Officer, R/o Near Sistodia Palace (Baratghar) Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur, Post & Thana Jabalpur, District Jabalpur.

---- Petitioners

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur. 2.

The Director, Ayush Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 3.

Joint Director, Treasury, Account and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur.

--- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Adiraj Surana, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/02/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per circular dated 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 24 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of

Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection. (3) Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(4) In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-