B.K. Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (S) No. 6016 of 2014 B.K. Shukla, aged 48 years, S/o Late N.K. Shukla, Presently Working as Assistant Grade-II, AT-PT. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Dist Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur

2. The Director Medical Education, Chhattisgarh, Near Old Nurses Hostel, Building, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

3. The Dean, Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Dist Raipur (C.G.)

4. Shri E.S.Kispotta, Administrative Officer/ Incharge Of Complaint Cell

5. Smt. Stela Das, Nursing Sister

6. Shri Sandeep Sharma, Computer Operator

7. Smt. Manju Waghe, Assistant Nursing Superintendent The respondent No.4 to 7 are working at Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri S. Mazid Ali, PL For Respondent No.5 Shri S. Pandya, Advocate For Respondent No.7 Shri Sachin Tamrakar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 23/04/2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the recruitment of Radiographer/Darkroom Assistant in the Medical College, Raipur, there were 12 members in the Selection Committee, yet the petitioner who is a Class-III employee has been singled out for constituting a departmental enquiry against him and has also been suspended. He would submit that the respondents are not filing return before this Court, at the same time the departmental enquiry is also not progressing. 2.

Considering the entire facts situation of the case, instead of keeping this petition pending, which is directed against the order of suspension, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the enquiry officer to conclude the pending departmental enquiry against the petitioner at the earliest, preferably within a period of 6 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Needless to say, while concluding the departmental enquiry, the respondents shall decide about the period of suspension. JUDGE Nirala