Motichand Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1057 of 2020

1. Motichand Sahu S/o Firat Ram Sahu Aged About 53 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Sasaha, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

2. Babu Ram Paikara S/o Pila Babu Paikara Aged About 50 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Dhabadih, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

6. Block Education Officer Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri Kunal Das, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 19/02/20

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in

WPS No.3088 of 2019 , therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

2. This Court in WPS No.3088 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following order:- "1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and on due verification pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of."

3. Learned State counsel do not dispute the fact brought to the notice of the Court by the petitioner.

4. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu