High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1644/2018disposed off

Anil Kumar Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1644 of 2018 Anil Kumar Baghel S/o Shri Banshi Lal Baghel Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Teacher, Panchayat At Govt. Middle School, Navghata, Block S. Lohara, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, DistrictKabirdham, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Preeti Garhe Working As Teacher Panchayat At Govt. Middle School, Jarhatola, Block S. Lohara, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For State :

Mr. S. Pandey, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14/03/2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that the petitioner was initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III on 21.09.1998 and was posted under Zila Panchayat, Durg, Chhattisgarh.

2. Subsequently, the petitioner is said to have made a request for transfer and his application was considered and he was transferred vide order dated 07.08.2008 and he joined the Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh on 08.08.2008.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has joined at Kabirdham on 08.08.2008 and he should have been granted the seniority from 08.08.2008 at Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, but the juniors to the petitioner, who have been appointed much

subsequent to the petitioner having joined at Kabirdham have been granted seniority over and above the petitioner.

4. He further submits that he has made a representation in this regard to the respondent No.2 but the same has till date not been considered or decided.

5. Given the aforesaid facts, since the representation is pending before the respondent No.2, this Court is not inclined to keep this petition pending and the petition thus stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annex.P/4) dated 27.01.2018 within a period of 60 days from the date the petitioner makes available the certified copy of the order of this Court to the respondent No.2.

6. The petitioner would also be at liberty to file any supplementary representation, if he so chooses.

7. It shall be the duty of the petitioner to bring the order of this Court to the notice of the respondent No.2.

8. The writ petition thus accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved