Patiram Sahu v. Union Of India And ORS

ii) W"

e gmgga @Qmga IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.t WRIT PETITION (S) NO.

15 $7 OF 2013 / v ~ PETITIONER :

Pati'ram Sahu, S/o.

Late Shri Gopal Ram Sahu, aged about years, R/o Ward No.

17, Sahupara, Revenue DistrictBemetara, Civil Bulb/me District - Durg (C.G.) PIN- 491335

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :

1. /Union of India, Through Secretary Ministry of Mines, Aluminum Sadan, core -6, scope office, complex, 7 Lodhi Raod, New Delhi x (India) 110003 2.

"§harat Aluminum Company / ThroughChief Executive Officer, Head OfficeBharat Aluminum l607rll?,,£ m.

Company Limited, Balco Nagar, gKQI/M".

P.S.- Balco, Tahsll and District a "Shani mi5shg KO rba (C I G ' ) Presented

3. / Hemant Bhatia, Manager Head H.R. Bharat Aluminum Company Limited, Balco Nagar, P.S.- Balco, Tahsil and District Korba (C G ) .Raghavan,

4. (/Dr.

P.K. N Manager Head QA & RD, Bharat Aluminum Company Limited, Balco Nagar, P.S.- Balco, Tahsil and District /"Korba (c.G.) 5.

Vishwas Saxena Manager Head H.R.

Plant-.1, Bharat Aluminum Company Limited, Balco Nagar, P.S.- Balco, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

%O/ 3a W, We, W m mugrgtgaoulmwm @W(W) mm fééimii assimm 30.4.2015:- lfor the petitioner.

.

Shri RaVi§h Verma, counsel 'or respondent No.1.

Shri Rajeéh Tiwari, counsel Shri Sudeep Agrawal, couns el for respondent No.2. Heard.

> "'~'+ :l by the Division Bench in Writ In View of the order passe 2013, learned counsel for the Appeal Nos."11715/2012 and 43/ the Court to withdraw! the writ petitioner seekev permission of y as available to the petitioner in petition with liberty to avail remed .

'5'

law.

1 is dismissed fas withdrawn with />'

Accordingly, the writ petitio liberty aforesaid;

rM Sdl- .

l Prashant Kumar Mtshra Judge Barve