Priya Agrawal v. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPHC No. 4 of 2016

1. Priya Agrawal D/O Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal, Aged About 31 Years W/O Shri Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, R/O Bilaspur Chowk, Darripara, Ambikapur, Police Station Ambikapur, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal S/O Shri Mahabir Agrawal, Aged About 35 Years R/O Mahamaya Mobile & Computer Centre, In Front Of Tej Medical Store, Old Bus Stand, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station New Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Inspector General Of Police, Surguja Range, Ambikapur, Civil And Revenue District Ambikapur (Surguja) (Chhattisgarh)

4. Superintendent Of Police, Ambikapur, Civil And Revenue District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Station House Officer, City Kotwali, Ambikapur, Civil And Revenue District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 : Shri Vivek Sharma, Govt. Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja Order on Board by Justice Pritinker Diwaker 09/03/2016:

The petitioner and respondent No.1 along with minor child are also present in person.

02. Pursuant to the order dated 23.2.2016 passed by this Court respondent No.1 has produced minor child Ku. Bhavi Agrawal, aged about 8 years. Respondent No.1 submits that he had no intention to

flout the order dated 17.7.2014 passed by this Court and he will duly obey and respect the said order. He submits that he took the minor child along with him as she had refused to go back to the petitioner. He further submits that in future he would be careful in making compliance of the orders passed by this Court and after visiting the child he will hand over her custody to the petitioner.

03. Custody of the minor child is handed over to the petitioner.

04. In view of this development, nothing survives in the present petition for adjudication and the same is accordingly disposed of. Sd/ Sd/ (Pritinker Diwaker) (I.S. Uboweja) Judge Judge Khan