Vijay Singh Rathor v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1101 of 2015 Vijay Singh Rathor, S/o. Shri Raja Ram Rathor, Aged About 28 years, Presently Posted as Assistant Teacher Panchayat at Naveen Primary School Dhaneli Nawagarh, R/O. Village & Post Seoni (Naila), Tahsil Janjir, P.S.

Naila District Janjir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Block Education Officer, Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondents-State :- Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 30/03/2015 1.

The petitioner through the instant writ petition has challenged the order dated 24.07.2014 (Annexure P/1) transferred the petitioner from Naveen Primary School Dhaneli, Nawagarh to Naveen Government Primary School Amoda Nawagarh.

..2..

..2..

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already made the representation to the authorities against the said order of transfer and the authorities have also considered his representation and has also recommended for issuance of appropriate order accommodating the petitioner at the place nearby Dhaneli. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the wife of the petitioner also is posted at near by place. He refers to Annexure P/9 which is note sheet issued in this respect recommending the transfer of the petitioner to a nearby place. 3.

At this juncture, without entering into the merit of the case, this Court is of the view, that the ends of justice would meet, in case if the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner keeping in mind the note sheet of the Block Education Officer Annexure P/9 and accordingly a proper suitable order be passed and the representation of the petitioner be also decided objectively.

4.

Meanwhile, it is expected that till the said representation of the petitioner is decided by the respondents they shall not take any corrosive steps against the petitioner. Let the authorities concerned take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of 3 months. 5.

With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

(P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Santosh