Smt Santoshi Ramteke v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 655 OF 2016 Smt Santoshi Ramteke W/o Yogendra Kumar Ramteke, Aged About 34 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Primary School Markatola, Block Narharpur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat District Kanker Chhattisgarh 3.

The Collector, District Kanker Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Narharpur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Koylibeda, District Kanker Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dilmanrati Minj, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 02/03/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by impugned order dated 31/10/2015 she has been transferred to

Koyalibeda, Distrtict Uttar Baster Kanker. Thereafter, she had gone to matrimonial leave from 16/11/2015 and delivered a baby on 26/12/2015, against which, she may be allowed to make representation before the respondent No. 2 and the respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the same in accordance with law. 2.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

3.

The petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent No. 2. If such representation is made by the petitioner within a period of ten days from today, the respondent No. 2 shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner. 4.

No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of one month.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

6.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the competent authority may decide the representation on its own merits.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari