Sonu Swa Sahayata Samuh Binouri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

`NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.

4 4 0 of 201 Sonu Swa Sahayta Samuh Binouri, Sector-Loarshi, Tahsil Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Through its Chairman- Smt. Satkali Bawre, aged about 36 years, W/oJitendra Kumar Bawre, R/o- Village Binouri, Police Station- Pachpedi, Tahsil Masturi, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.), Mo. No.9329649257 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Police Station- Rakhi, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) Mo. No. :- Not Known

2. Collector, Collectorate Officer Bilaspur, Police Station - Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. No.:- Not Known

3. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme Masturi, Police Station & Tahsil - Masturi, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. Nok.:- Not Known

4. District Program Officer, Women and Child Development Department Bilaspur, Police Station - Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. No.:- Not Known ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. R.K. Bhagat, Advocate.

For Respondent/State:

Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board /0 2 /201 (1) Instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 02.02.2018, by which production & supply of ready to eat food allotted to petitioner has been terminated by respondent No. 4 - District Program Officer. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

impugned order is bad and unsustainable in law, which is liable to be set aside.

(3) Per contra, learned counsel for the State would submit that on the basis of new policy dated 5.6.2017 impunged order has been passed, which is appealable firstly before the Collector and secondly before the Divisional Commissioner.

(4) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. (5) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file appeal against the impugned order, which was passed under the new policy of the State Government dated 5.6.2017, before the Collector or the Divisional Commissioner, as the case may be. In the eventuality of filing such appeal, the same is directed to be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. (6) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-