← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/98/2021disposed off

Laxmikant v. Dinesh Vishwas

2021-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.C.C. No.98 of 2021 • Laxmikant S/o Late Juraan, Aged About 65 Years R/o. P.V. No. 72, Village Chandanpur, Police Station And Tehsil Pakhaanjoor, District Uttar Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh) (Plaintiff In Civil Suit No. 11 A/08 And Appellant In Civil Appeal No.5A/15) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Dinesh Vishwas S/o Late Juraan, Aged About 73 Years R/o P.V. No. 72, Village Chandanpur, Police Station And Tehsil Pakhaanjoor, District Uttar Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh....(Defendant In Civil Suit No. 11 A/08 And Respondent In Civil Appeal No. 5 A/15)

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, Collectorate, District Uttar Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh).......(Defendant In Civil Suit No. 11 A/08 And Respondent In Civil Appeal No. 5 A/15) ---- Non-applicants Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 22-02-2021

1. Registry has moved a request letter on this basis that in the operative paragraph of order dated 01.02.2021 passed in W.P.(227) No.346 of 2020, the Civil Suit No.58/2015 has been erroneously mentioned, which should have been Civil Appeal No.5-A/2015.

2. The petition was directed against the order of the appellate Court, hence, the mention of number of Civil Suit is clearly erroneous, that is a clerical mistake, which is required to be corrected. Hence, the request

-2made in the P.U.D. is allowed, it is ordered that in paragraph 7 of order dated 01.02.2021 in W.P.(227) No.346 of 2020, instead of Civil Suit No.58 of 2015, it should be read as Civil appeal No.5A/2015 hereinafter. Copy of this order shall be made a part of W.P.(227) No.346 of 2020.

3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Monika Judge