← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1658/2018disposed off

Ramkripal Shankh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1658 of 2018 Ramkripal Shankh S/o Late Shri Heera Ram Shankh, Aged About 72 Years Retired Assistant Grade 3, R/o Behind Primary School Aarang, Police Station Aarang, Civil, Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Cell Government, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhavan, P.S., Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Gobra Nawapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director (Finance) Directorate Town Administration And Development Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Dy. Secretary, Govt. Of C.G. General Administration Department (Member Secretary, Pension Committee) Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that petitioner is entitled for traveling allowance of Rs. 61,200/- for which he has made representation before the respondent No. 2 that may be directed to be consider and decide the same expeditiously.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The prayer is fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed. 4.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 2 - Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Gobra Nawapara is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation for grant of traveling allowance expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner would also be at liberty to make additional representation before the concerned respondent authority, if any. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka