High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1010/2020disposed off

Devendra Kumar Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1010 of 2020 • Devendra Kumar Singh S/o Shri A.K. Singh, Aged About 43 Years R/o. Purani Society Gali, Infront Of Advocate Udayraj Tiwari, Post Fundudihari, Godhanpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Kushal Vikas Technical And Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Department Of Technical Training Education And Employment, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Director (Training), Industrial Training Institute, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Keshav Prasad Gupta, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Neeraj Pradhan, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14/02/2020

1. Heard.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is working with the respondents on contractual basis for last 10 years and till today he is working. He further submits that the contractual period had ended on 26.07.2016 but his services are being continuously availed. The apprehension looms that the service may be discontinued for the coming period, therefore, the petitioner prays that the respondents may take a decision on the representation if so made by the petitioner demanding for extension of the contractual service.

3. Considering the limited grievance raised, the petitioner is given liberty to make a suitable representation/ prayer to Respondent No. 1& 2 for the back ground that he is working from last 9 to 10 years and if such request is made, the same shall be considered by Respondent No. 1 & 2 and may pass necessary orders. It is expected that the respondents in case are in need of contractual Training Officer, they shall consider the case of the petitioner unless the services of the petitioner was unsatisfactory or was discontinued because of some specific misconduct or non-performance or the petitioner is being replaced by the regular Training Officer.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti