Upendra Kumar Sahu And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
^ ^'A"
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT APPEAL No.
v\*-l"
OF 2014 APPELLANT 1.
UpendraKumar Sahu, aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Chhannulal Sahu, Village Chicha, Post Gabdi, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh l^ ^.-•^S- -.••'T \> 1 ":•••").
l^1-^-"""
/•'_....
2.
Bhushanlal Dilliwar, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Feruram Dilliwar, R/o Village Vinayakpur, District Durg, Chhattisgarh f fK.;'!»• fis^ VE R S U S RESPONDENTS A:
State of Chhattisgarh, Through:
Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil & District Chhattisgarh (earlier address D.K.S.
Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh now the address is changed) 2.
Director, Directorate Health Services, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3.
The Collector, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4.
Chief Medical & Health Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 5.
Chief Medical Officer and Health Officer, Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 6.
Chief Medical Officer and Health Officer, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh 7.
Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, through:its Registrar, Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, D.K.S.
Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1 tOF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BEANCH) ACT 2006, Being aggrieved by the impugned common or'der dated 08/08/2013 (Annexure A/1) passed in Writ Petition 2115/2012, Upendra Kumar Sahu and. another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, by the learned Single .DHIRAJ KUMAR WANKHEDE ADVOCATE
.'i'
. f ^ ^tt,'*%„ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR D.B.:
HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY. J.
WRITAPPEALNO. 428 OF 2014 APPELLANTS Upendra Kumar Sahu and Another
Versus
RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and Others (WRIT APREAL UN©ERSECTIQN 2(1) OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH .COURT (XPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT 2006) Appearance:
Mr. Dhiraj KumarWankhede.Advocate fortheAppellants. Mr. A.S. Gaharwar, Additional Advocate General for the State.
O R D E R
(18th ofFebruary, 2015) PER NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CJ.
1.
The appeal is barred by delay of 428 days. Similar appeals have already been disposed at the request of the Appellants for pursuing matters with the State Government itself.
2.
In the nature of the orders passed earlier and after hearing the Learned Additional Advocate General for the State, delay is condoned. 3.
The appeal is disposed in similar terms as the order dated 30.10.2014 inWritAppealNo.530 of 2014.
Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Anu Sd/- Acting Chief Justice