Tulsidas Nayak v. Shri Alarmel Mangai Di

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 85 of 2016 Tulsidas Nayak S/o Shri Ratiram Nayak, Aged About 71 Years R/o VillageKharwani (Baramkela), Tahsil And P.O. & P.S. Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

Shri Alarmel Mangai Di, Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ............(Contemnor) ---- Respondent For Petitioner :

Shri Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For respondent :

Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate S.B.:Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 17/03/2016 Heard.

1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that an order has been passed on 10.3.2016 deciding petitioner's representation as directed by this Court. He submits that for the reasons stated in the reply, the delay in deciding the representation may be condoned as the respondent had no intention to flout the order of the Court.

2. Considering the totally of the circumstances, particularly that the representation of the petitioner has been decided on 10.3.2016, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. However, considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that according to him,

-2the order is not correct, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the correctness of the order dated 10.3.2016 in a separately constituted petition.

3. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen