← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5046/2017allowed

Vijay Pratap Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.5046 of 2017 • Vijay Pratap Singh S/o Late Shri Deenanath Singh, Aged About 40 Years R/o Quarter No. A / 2, 2nd Battalion, C.A.F. Sakri, Police Station Chakarbhatta, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home / Police, Mahanadi, Mantralaya, Police Station & Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Additional Director General Of Police, (A.D.G.P.), Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C.A.F.) Police Headquarters ( P H Q), Near Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station & Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Inspector General Of Police, (I.G.P.), Chhattisgarh Armed Force ( C A F), Police Headquarter (P H Q), Near Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station & Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Commandant, 2nd Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force ( C A F ) Sakri, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Commandant, 7th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Froce ( C A F ), Bhilai, Police Station Supela, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Satish Gupta, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 13/11/2017 Heard.

1.

Though last opportunity was granted, today, learned State counsel again prays for short time to file reply.

2.

Earlier, this Court had made it clear that even if no instructions are

received, appropriate order would be passed.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 22.03.2017 passed in WPS No.5558 of 2016 and batch of matters.

4.

This factual submission is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for the State.

5.

Accordingly, this petition is also allowed. Impugned order in relation to the petitioner is quashed on the same terms and consideration as ordered by this Court in WPS No.5558 of 2016 and batch of matters. SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane