High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6326/2014infructuous

Dr. M.S. Khokhar v. Union Of India And ORS.

2015-08-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6326 of 2014 • Dr. M.S. K. Khokhar (Dr. Mohd. Saied Khan Khokhar) S/o Late Shri M.W.K. Khokhar Aged About 66 years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As Pro Vice Chancellor Of Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University), Bilaspur 495009, Chhattisgarh R/o 4, Khokhar Lane, Opposite Mission Hospital, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur - 495 001, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

• Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resource Development, Department Of Higher Education, New Delhi • Chancellor, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University) Koni, Thana Koni, Tehsil Distt Bilaspur - 495 009, Chhattisgarh • Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University) Through The Registrar, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Koni, Thana Koni, Tehsil District Bilaspur 495 009, Chhattisgarh • Prof. S.P.Singh Professor, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, (A Central University), Koni, Thana Koni, Dist Bilaspur 495 009, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Dr. N.K. Shukla, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Shailendra Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner.

For Respondent/UOI Mr. S.S. Rajput, Advocate For Respondent No.3 Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No.4 Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/08/2015 Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

(2) In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 10.11.2014 (Annexure P/1) and the consequential order passed by the Central University on 11.11.2014 (Annexure P/2), whereby, the petitioner has been removed from the post of ofÏciating Vice Chancellor of Guru Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur and respondent No.4 has been made ofÏciating Vice Chancellor. (3) It is common ground that during pendency of this writ petition, regular Vice Chancellor has already been appointed in the said University.

(4) In view of the above, the cause of action does not survive for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna