Ravindra Kumar Pulast v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4916 of 2017 Ravindra Kumar Pulast S/o Chandan Singh Pulast Aged About 46 Years Permanent Resident Of Village Limha, Post Beltara, Thana Ratanpur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Naya Raipur Chhattisagarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Office Of Chife Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ....Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/09/2017 Heard.

1. The transfer order is under challenge on the ground which do not relate to jurisdiction or malafide. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the transfer order when the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy of statutory appeal under the provision of Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995.

2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation has already been preferred. Let the representation be decided by respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved, his remedy of filing of appeal would be available under the Rules of 1995.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha