← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/148/2018disposed off

Mohammad Tasleem v. Taran Prakash Sinha

2018-05-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 148 of 2018 Mohammad Tasleem S/o Late Mohammad Yasin Aged About 64 Years Occupation Retired Government Officer Through Abida Begum W/o Mohammad Tasleem Aged About 54 Years Currently Residing At Kumharpara Near New India School Jarhabhata Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Taran Prakash Sinha Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (Contemnors), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Kunwar Singh Marko Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (Contemnors), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. A. S. Kachhawah, Additional AG For respondent No. 2 :

Mr. B. L. Sahu, Advocate.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 15/05/2018 1.

This Court had directed personal appearance of respondent No. 2. Today the said officer is not present but learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that respondent No. 2 had already retired and in his place another officer who is presently holding the post of Chief Executive Officer, Jashpur Smt. Sonmati Tirki is present in the Court referring to the return and the documents placed on record. It is submitted that order has now been complied with as the pension case of the petitioner is finalized after receipt of necessary instruction from the higher authorities and giving appropriate treatments to the period absence of the petitioner. This Court

had gone through the reply and various orders passed by the State Government, Director as also CEO satisfied the pension case of the petitioner has now been finalized after removal of the impediments. Therefore, in these circumstances, I am not inclined to proceed further against the respondent authorities. The contempt case is accordingly closed.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit