← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1246/2015disposed off

Dilip Kumar Jain And ORS. v. State Govt. Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-04-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1246 of 2015

1. Dilip Kumar Jain S/O Shri Ishwar Lal Jain Aged About 40 years Govt. Cattle Disease Research Laboratory Kanker, Post & Thana Kanker, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Naresh Singh S/O Shri Manbahal Singh Aged About 41 Years Veterinary Office Kotela (Charama), Post & Thana Kanker, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Laxmikant Sahu S/O Shri Brijlal Sahu Aged About 40 Years Office Of Mukhaya Gram Yojna, Bhanupratap-pur, Post & Thana Bhanupratap-pur, Distt. Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Vishnu Ram Sahu S/O Shri Charan Singh Sahu Aged About 41 Years Office Of Veterinary Office Budeli, Post & Thana- Narharpur, Distt. Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Shatrughan Dewangan, S/O Shri Chain Singh Dewangan Aged About 38 Years Veterinary Office Jamgaon, Post & Thana Narharpur, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department Of Veterinary Services Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Department Of Veterinary Services, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Joint Director, Department Of Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, DistrictBaster At Jagdalpur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Deputy Director, Department Of Veterinary Services, Kanker, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Joint Director, Treasury Account & Pension, Jagdalpur, District-Baster at Jagdalpur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri SK Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 09/04/2015

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Petitioners are Sweeper in the Department of Veterinary Services. They have preferred this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to grant them the pay scale of Rs. 2500-3200/-.

2. According to learned counsel for the petitioners similarly situated Sweepers namely Panchram Mourya, Sridhar Goel, Madhuram, Nagendra Singh Dhakar and Satyawan amongst others have been paid the above said pay scale however, it appears, by clerical mistake petitioners name have been left out while the said pay scale was granted to others.

3. Considering the controversy involved in this writ petition this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with direction that if the petitioners submits fresh representation within a period of 15 days from today the competent authority shall decide the said representation on merits, by speaking order, in accordance with law, within further period of three months. The authority shall specifically deal with the ground raised by the petitioners that the similarly situated Sweepers have been granted benefit of pay scale of Rs.2500-3200/-.

4. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE ashu