Rajkumri Raghuvanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Criminal Case No.1256 of 2020 Rajkumari Raghuvanshi, W/o Tribhuwan Patel, aged about 31 years, R/o Belgadi Basti, Balco, Police Station Balco, District Korba (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Kotwali, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicant:

Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate.

For Non-applicant:

Ms. Richa Shukla, Deputy Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/06/2020

1. The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing her on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.496/2019, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Korba, Distt. Korba for the offence punishable under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant was found in unauthorised possession of 5 Kgs. of Ganja without any authority of law.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence, she has been falsely implicated in the case, there are no criminal antecedents of the applicant and charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant has been arrested on 16-8-2019.

4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the application.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the submissions.

6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, facts and circumstances of the case and considering the quantity of Ganja seized from the possession of the applicant, I am of the view that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

7. It is, therefore, directed that the applicant be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for her appearance as and when directed.

8. It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23-3-2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No.1/2020), she need not furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if she has not furnished bail bonds earlier, then she will be required to furnish bail bonds.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma