Sheetala Mata Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Johdhra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 458 of 2018 Sheetla Mata Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Johdhra, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Through Its Chairman Smt. Bimla Bai, Aged About 45 Years, D/o Ramjee Barai R/o Village Jondhra, Police Station Pachpedi, Tahsil Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi Tahsil Civil, Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Collector, Collectorate Office Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme Masturi, Police Station Tahsil Masturi, Civil, Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department Bilaspur Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil, Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. Chairman Sakhi Gurughasidas Mahila Swa Sahayta Samuh Mudpar Police Station Mulmula Tahsil Akaltara, Civil Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPC No. 466 of 2018 Sakhi Jai Maa Sumiran Mahila Swa Sahayat Samuh Hardadih, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.), Through its Chairman - Smt. Sukrita Bai Sahu, aged about 50 years, W/o Yaduram Sahu, Occupation House Wife, R/o Village Hardadih, Post Eramsashi, Via Jairamnagar, Police Station Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi Tahsil Civil, Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Collector, Collectorate Office Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme Masturi, Police Station Tahsil Masturi, Civil, Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department Bilaspur Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil, Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/02/18 1.
This instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 02.02.2018 by which the production and supply of ready to eat food alloted to the petitioner has been terminated by respondent No. 4 - District Program Officer, Bilaspur.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order is bad and unsustainable in law and is liable to be set aside. 3.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State would submit that on the basis of new policy dated 05.06.2017 impugned order has been passed, which is appealable firstly before the Collector and secondly before the Divisional Commissioner.
4.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 5.
Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file appeal against the impugned order, which has been passed under the new policy of the State Government dated 05.06.2017, before the Collector or the Divisional Commissioner, as the case may be. In the eventuality of filing such appeal,
the same is directed to be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. The petitioner would also be at liberty to file an application for stay before the respondent authorities that will be considered and decided within one week. 6.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka