Ajmeri Begam v. Smt. Rampyari Patel

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No. 150 of 2018 1.

Ajmeri Begam, wife of Saiad Ahmed Ali, resident of Jarahbata, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2.

Sharifa Begam, wife of Ahmed Hasan, resident of Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3.

Hajjan Julekha Begam, wife of Haji Abdul Sharif Khan, resident of Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4.

Hajjan Hanifa Begam, wife of Haji Iftekhar Khan, resident of Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5.

Hajjan Nazma Begam, wife of Shekh Hakimul Rehman, resident of Aadarsh Nagar Colony, S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (C.G.) 6.

Hajjan Rahima Begam, wife of Haji Sayed Abdul Saleem Khan, resident of Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 7.

Abdul Rahim Khan, son of Late Haji Mohammad Khan, resident of Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) ----Petitioners/applicants

Versus

1. Smt. Ram Pyari Patel, aged about 33 years, wife of Late Bisun Patel.

2. Sanju Patel, aged about 15 years, son of Late Bisun Patel,

3. Ku. Sangita Patel, aged about 13 years, daughter of Late Bisun Patel.

4. Aman Patel, aged about 09 years, son of Late Bisun Patel.

5. Ku. Sanjana Patel, aged about 07 years, daughter of Late Bisun Patel. Respondents No. 2 to 5 all minors and are represented through their legal representatives and natural guardian Smt. RamPyari Patel, wife of Late Bisun Patel.

Respondents No. 1 to 5 all resident of Magarpara Chowk, Marar Gali, Magarpara, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) ........Plaintiffs

6. Girdhari Singh Thakur, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Bhagwat Singh Thakur, resident of Naaya Para, Sirgatti, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)

7. Sunil Patel, aged about 30 years, son of Late Sudh Ram Patel.

8. Dilip Patel, aged about 26 years, son of Late Sudh Ram Patel. Respondents No. 7 & 8 are resident of Gram Farahada, Tahsil Sipat, Bilaspur,

Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9.

Nirmal Kumar Mishra, aged about 32 years, son of Hazari Prasad Mishra, resident of Naya Para, Kirti Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) 10.

State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) ...Defendants ---- Respondents For Petitioners : None For Respondent No. 10 : Shri Aditya Sharma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/10/2018 (1) Even after the mater was called out for hearing in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, in these circumstances, this court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. (2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-