M/S Bharti Chemicals v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 647 of 2015 M/s. Bharti Chemicals, through Proprietor Shri Ajay Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri C.S.Agrawal, Aged about 39 years, Plot No. 109-F, Sector-B, Sirgitti Industrial Area, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited, for short S.E.C.L. ( A Miniratna Company) a subsidiary of Coal India Limited, a Government of India Undertaking, through the C.M.D. S.E.C.L. Seepat Road, Post Box No. 60, Bilaspur 495006, Chhattisgarh.

2. The General Manager (MM)/HOD, Tender Inviting Authority, S.E.C.L. Seepat Road, Bilaspur 495006, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Technical Evaluation Committee, through the General Manager (MM)/HOD, Seepat Road, Bilaspur 495006, Chhattisgarh

4. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary of Industries Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Director of Industries, Udyog Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

6. Mine Aid Products (L1), Plot No. 25/C, Tifra Industrial Area of C.S.I.D.C. Limited, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

7. Pawan Putra Chemicals (L2), Kailash Dal Mill Compound, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

8. Hightech Mining Products (L3) Behind Ramdeo Rice Mill, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

9. Minetech Mining (L4), Kailash Dal Mill Compound, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri U.N.Awasthy, Senior Advocate with Ms. Raksha Awasthy, Advocate.

For Respondents 1 to 3 :

Shri R.K.Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents 4 and 5 :

Shri Prafull N Bharat, Additional Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.

Order On Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 16/04/2015 1.

After some argument, Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner proposes to represent before the Respondent No. 1 its grievances for grant of necessary benefits as a Small Scale Medium Industrial Unit/Ancillary Unit of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited. 2.

We make no observations with regard to the same except that if the Petitioner files a representation, the Respondents shall expeditiously consider the same in accordance with law and dispose it by a reasoned and speaking order.

3.

The writ application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P.Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Amit