Daiman Singh Mandle v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5198 of 2017 Daiman Singh Mandle S/o Shri M.R.Mandle, Aged About 34 Years Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Katekalyan, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture And Bio-Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Ministry New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Dy. Director, Agriculture, Dantewada District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Agriculture Engineer, Agriculture Engineering, Dantewada, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/10/2017 Heard on admission.

1. The petitioner has filed this petition for issuance of direction to the respondent / transferring authority to relieve him on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued by the State Government, till date, he has not been relieved.

2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled by the State Government itself.

-23. Therefore, in these circumstances, this petition is disposed off with the direction that the petitioner shall be relieved forthwith by the controlling authority in compliance of order (Annexure P/1) unless the State has not modified, varied or cancelled the impugned transfer order.

4. The petition is disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen