← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5402/2017allowed

Tana Ram Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.5402 of 2017

1. Tana Ram Verma S/o Hai Lal, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Khaparikala, Post Keshda, Thana Newara, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Hari Ram Vishvakarma S/o Late Dindayal Vishvakarma, Aged About 62 Years R/o Mohabhatta, Post Mohabhatta, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Lachhan Gaud, S/o Late Gangu, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Tehaka, Post Datrengi, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Project, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Executive Engineer, Department Of Mahanadi Water Resources, Division No. 3, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Senior Account Officer, P. F. N. 40, Office Of The Accountant General, (Account / Pension / Fund), Near Zero Point, Near Vidhan Sabha, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ashok Patil, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Avinash Singh, PL For Respondent No.4 :

Shri Ashwani Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/10/2017 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals.

Against the said order, the State travelled up to the Supreme Court by filing SLP (C) Nos.11541-11550/2016, which have been dismissed by the Supreme Court, affirming the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. They would pray that this writ petition may also be allowed in the same terms. 2.

In view of the above joint statement made, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals. Let the current pension of the petitioner be calculated, upon due verification of facts, and payment commenced preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order and the arrears to be paid within a period of 12 months from the date current pension starts. 3.

A copy of the order dated 26.2.2015 passed in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals, be made a part of this record. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane